Foreword

Every so often a concept emerges in the management of solid

malignancy that is rapidly incorporated into practice or alters

our perception of treatment and accordingly has the potential to

influence treatment algorithms significantly. Sentinel lymph node

scintigraphy and biopsy represent a classic example. This method

was initially introduced for the management of malignant mela-

noma and rapidly proved to be popular and valuable. It has sub-

sequently been applied to breast cancer and its popularity has spread

with almost indecent haste. With increasing experience it is be-

coming apparent that the technique, whilst of potential value, never-

theless requires fastidious performance if it is to be effective, and

it must be assessed carefully. Demonstration of proven efficacy is

necessary if it is to be incorporated into general surgical practice.

What do we mean by efficacy in this case? Up until about 30 years

ago surgical clearance of the axilla was considered essential as a life-

saving component of the radical management of primary breast

cancer. Since then, however, we have become more modest in our

objectives.We now look upon axillary node dissection as primarily a

means of controlling the disease locally, whilst at the same time

providing valuable prognostic information to make decisions about

adjuvant systemic therapy or for counselling the patient in other

ways.As breast cancer is being diagnosed at earlier and earlier stages,

the positivity of the axilla after radical clearance has fallen to a level

of about 30 %. This means that up to 70 % of patients with primary

breast cancer are undergoing unnecessary axillary dissection with its

subsequent morbidity for no particular return. At the same time,

is adjuvant chemotherapy being recommended to more and more

patients with negative axillae, particularly amongst the pre-meno-

pausal group, in spite of a negative lymph node status. Ideally,

therefore, we need some procedure that will allow us to avoid un-

necessary radical treatment of the negative axilla, whilst allowing us

to make borderline decisions about the role of adjuvant systemic

therapies amongst patients at the more favourable end of the

spectrum of prognosis. It is in this area that the sentinel node biopsy

is likely to prove its worth, but not until it has been subjected to

a large, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial, comparing un-

selected axillary node clearance and management dependent on

the outcome of the sentinel node biopsy. Such a trial has just been

funded by the Medical Research Council in the UK, and it is to be

 

                                                                                   next page